Skip to Content
Interactive Textbook on Clinical Symptom Research Logo


Home Button

Fatigue Sections
Author Bio
Introduction
Fatigue in Medical Illness
Fatigue Defined
Research Questions
Measurement and Assessment
Fatigue Measurement
Related Constructs
Designing Fatigue Surveys
Case Definition
Data Collection
Maximizing Completion
Designing Intervention Trials
Controlled Trials
Currently selected section: Selecting Study Procedures
Issues in Data Analysis
Conclusion




Chapter 9: Fatigue: Selecting Study Procedures
        
Patient Selection

Adult inpatients or outpatients will be recruited from the inpatient wards and the ambulatory clinics. The patient's primary attending physician will be informed of the plan to recruit the patient into the study before the patient is contacted.

Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Diagnosis of cancer, with active disease.
  2. Patient has received no primary antineoplastic therapy or the most recent cancer therapy (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery) occurred at least two months earlier.
  3. Patient has a Karnofsky Performance Status score of >70 and has a life expectancy of at least 3 months.
  4. Patient is able to swallow and absorb oral medications.
  5. Medications for other chronic disorders will be allowed as long as doses have been stable for a minimum of three weeks and no dose changes are anticipated during the duration of the trial.
  6. Patients with average daily fatigue of 5 or greater, as indicated by the response to the following criterion question: "How would you rate your fatigue, on average during the past week, using a zero to 10 scale, where 0 is no fatigue at all and 10 is the worst fatigue that you can imagine?"
Exclusion Criteria:
  1. No relative or absolute contraindications to treatment with psychostimulant drugs, specifically cardiac arrhythmia or other significant cardiac disease, severe anorexia, severe insomnia, delirium or significant paranoid ideation.
  2. No evidence of severe pulmonary, renal or hepatic disease; serum creatinine and liver function tests must be no higher than 2 times the upper limit of normal.
  3. No evidence of acute or chronic encephalopathy or psychiatric disease severe enough to compromise data collection.
  4. No known allergy to modafinil.

Discussion: The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the drug for chronic cancer-related fatigue. Fatigue may be determined by many factors in the cancer population and numerous options exist for entry criteria into the study. This is a good illustration of the trade-offs that must be considered. Suppose the aim was to clarify the effect of the drug on fatigue related primarily to advanced cancer and not to cancer therapy, depression, anemia, or any of the other factors that could be etiologic in this population. Recruitment would likely be very difficult. Instead, the decision has been made to try to limit the impact of therapy (and to reduce the likelihood of studying patients who are experiencing transitory fatigue) by setting up an interval of at least two months from the time of last antineoplastic therapy. This, in itself, is likely to make recruitment far more difficult, but the risk is worth taking for the chance to have a more homogeneous study population and avoid the problem of transitory fatigue. The decision to include patients with other etiologies for fatigue is less worrisome if data about these potential etiologies and comorbidities are collected during the study, thereby holding open the possibility that their impact can be evaluated statistically.

 

Page 39 of 45

Previous Page