Skip to Content
Interactive Textbook on Clinical Symptom Research Logo


Home Button

Assessing Desirability of Outcome States
Author Biographies
Introduction
Common Health Status Measures
Preference-Based Measures
Direct Utility Elicitation
Issues with Utiliy Assessment
How are Utilities Used?
Utility and Health Status
Currently selected section: Utility and Sociodemographic Factors
Computerized Utility Assessment
Catalogs of Utilities
Case Studies
Conclusions


Chapter 24: Assessing Desirability of Outcome Stats: Utility and Sociodemographic Factors
        

In addition to measurement error, failure to account adequately for sociodemographic factors may account for some of the difficulty in predicting utility from health status. Cultural issues play a major role in medical decision-making for seriously ill patients (Koenig and Gates-Williams, 1995; Hallenbeck, Goldstein et al., 1996; Koenig, 1997; Hallenbeck and Goldstein, 1999; Ruhnke, Wilson et al., 2000).

Several studies of patient preferences for medical care for serious or terminal illness have shown differences by race, with African American patients requesting on average more life-sustaining treatments than their white counterparts (Caralis and Hammond, 1992; Caralis, Davis et al., 1993; Garrett, Harris et al., 1993). The differences in advance directive choices by race of patients are mirrored in physicians' choices for themselves (Mebane, Oman et al., 1999).

Utility ratings can differ significantly by socioeconomic factors (Katz, Phillips et al., 1994; Roberge, Berthelot et al., 1995), and by race and gender (Cykert, Joines et al., 1999), although not all studies have confirmed those associations.

Page 10 of 14
Previous Section