Skip to Content
Interactive Textbook on Clinical Symptom Research Logo


Home Button

Clinical Trials in TMD Sections
Author Bio
Introduction
The Biopsychosocial Model
Designing Multicenter RCTs
Players in an RCT
Randomization
Trial Design Quality
TMD Case Definition
Endpoints and Outcome Measures
Blinding & Masking
Study Sample Size
Number and Nature of Interventions
Study Length and Follow up
Intent-to-treat Analyses and Sample Size
Compliance
Currently selected section: Multicenter RCTs
Implementing RCTs: Practical Issues
Analysis of TMD Trials
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Appendix A
Appendix B

 

Chapter 22: Clinical Trials in Temporomandibular: Multicenter RCTs
        

Establishing a Structure for Planning & Communication

If nothing else, a multicenter clinical trial is a collaborative effort. Generally, a planning committee is created early for the purpose of furthering the collaboration by organizing each of the components and phases of the RCT protocol--see Table 1.1 for an outline of RCT components. Sub-committees can be created for planning, identifying potential centers, investigators, physical resources, and even funding possibilities. Early in the planning stages attention should also be directed to developing plans and criteria for data management, data analysis, and report writing.

The need for clear and consistent channels of communication is absolutely essential. Multicenter trials will inevitably require multiple meetings over time at many levels. Participation and enduring cooperation can be facilitated by involvement of as many people as possible in the planning process and when defining responsibilities for conducting different levels of the trial.

Each center contemplated for inclusion in the development of a multicenter RCT should have, from the beginning, a clear understanding of that center's role and level of involvement. Not all centers are equally "research-rich" and it is inevitable that one or two centers take lead roles in planning and managing a multicenter trial--a kind of "first among equals". However, such levels of responsibility, clear chains of command, making clear who the PI and key personnel will be and extent of involvement for all key personnel and lead centers should be laid out clearly and early in the planning process and then communicated to all potential investigating centers for their evaluation.

Timetables for reporting and timetables for receiving feedback should be built into all levels of the communication process.

Page 55 of 81
      Previous Page