Skip to Content
Interactive Textbook on Clinical Symptom Research Logo


Home Button

Secondary Analysis of Large Survey Database
Author Bio
Why Conduct Secondary Anaylsis
Advantages of Survey Data
Avoiding the Pitfalls
Start with the Research Question
Determine Variables of Interest
Identify and Evaluate the Data Source
Get the Data
Survey Design
Sampling Frame
Telephone Surveys
Followback Surveys
Multistage Cluster Samples
What is a Panel Design
Mode of Survey Administration
Survey Instruments
CodeBooks
Online Exploratory Analysis
Potential Sources of Error
Cultural Nonequivalence
Analysis of Survey Data
Cluster and Stratified Samples
Using Sample Weights
Currently Selected Section: Missing Data
Power Calculations
Linking Data Sources
Multiple Comparisons
Getting Help
Giving Feedback
Conclusion
Chapter 20: Secondary Analysis of Large Survey Database: Missing Data
          

Missing data can bias results and can also reduce sample size. Analysis of variables having missing values will affect statistical tabulations and tests of significance.

Multivariate procedures, such as linear regression, require complete information on variables that are in the model. Observations having missing values in model variables are deleted; this can seriously reduce the degrees of freedom. In tabular analysis, different combinations of variables with missing values will yield tables based on different sample sizes. The number of cases in the study varies from table to table. Sometimes it is possible to infer that a "missing" value really means "none" of the property being measured, in which case missing can become the number zero.

In categorical variables it is possible to code "missing" as a response category for the variable. Another alternative is to replace the missing value with the mean response of subjects that had similar demographic or other relevant characteristics. Preserving sample size is very important. A variety of statistical techniques such as imputation are also used to handle missing data (Faris et al., 2002; Groves et al., 2002; Rubin, 1987).

 

Page 24 of 30
      Previous Section