Skip to Content
Interactive Textbook on Clinical Symptom Research Logo


Home Button

Somatization and Symptoms Evaluation
Author Bios
Introduction
Defining Somatization
Detecting Symptoms
Dimensions of Symptoms
Measuring Symptoms
Psychiatric Comorbidity
Interpreting Symptom Measures
Functional Syndromes and Symptoms
Etiology of Symptoms
Levels of Etiological Certainty
Strengthening Etiological Classification
Confounding Etiological Factors
Symptoms and Patient Expectations
Interpreting Patient Responses
Measuring Multiple Symptoms
Global Rating of Change
Measuring Somatization
Measuring Other Domains
Currently selected section: Conclusions


Chapter 16: Somatization and Symptoms Evaluation: Conclusions
        

In conclusion, research in which symptoms are a primary or secondary outcome must take into account the high symptom burden in individuals with cancer and other chronic illnesses, hospitalized populations, the palliative care setting, and, in general, patients with medical or psychiatric comorbidity.

The default presumption is (and should be) that a discrete pathological lesion or agent that can be reasonably linked to a physical symptom is indeed the likely cause (e.g. back pain in a patient with vertebral compression fracture, dyspnea in a patient with extensive pulmonary metastases, constipation in a patient on high doses of narcotics).

However, when symptoms are more general in nature or less definitively connected to a specific physical cause, greater in number, or poorly responsive to specific treatments, the possibility of coexisting somatization should be entertained.

There are several reasons that studying the prevalence and impact of somatization in palliative care is important. First, 10% of ambulatory care patients have at least a moderate level of somatization; since many of these patients will eventually develop serious disorders later in life (if not earlier), it would be clinically useful to know how they respond to structural disease in terms of the number and severity of symptoms reported. Second, medical and psychosocial stress itself can trigger somatization even in individuals who have previously not been somatizing patients. Thus, persistent, multiple somatic symptoms unresponsive to medical interventions in some patients with a terminal illness may be due to pre-existing or incident somatization as well as to the advanced physical disorder.

Examples of research questions include:

  • Do patients with pre-existing somatization respond differently to serious structural disease in terms of symptom reporting than nonsomatizing patients?
  • What do psychological disorders (depression and anxiety), unaddressed patient concerns and expectations, coping style, and other factors separate from the structural disease itself contribute to symptom reporting and response to treatment?
  • What is the longitudinal course of symptom reporting (including number and severity of symptoms and related impairment) in various stages of a disease like cancer, such as pretreatment, remission, recurrence, and refractory progression?
  • In patients with advanced illness and symptoms that are responding inadequately to medical interventions, does the addition of psychological treatments (e.g. antidepressants or brief cognitive-behavioral therapy) benefit some individuals?
  • What are the similarities and differences in physical symptom reporting among patients with different types of serious conditions, such as cancer, HIV disease, and advanced cardiopulmonary disease?


Other recommendations for research are published elsewhere (Breitbart et al, 1995).

Page 26 of 26
Previous Section