Skip to Content
Interactive Textbook on Clinical Symptom Research Logo


Home Button

Somatization and Symptoms Evaluation
Author Bios
Introduction
Defining Somatization
Detecting Symptoms
Dimensions of Symptoms
Measuring Symptoms
Psychiatric Comorbidity
Interpreting Symptom Measures
Functional Syndromes and Symptoms
Etiology of Symptoms
Levels of Etiological Certainty
Strengthening Etiological Classification
Confounding Etiological Factors
Symptoms and Patient Expectations
Interpreting Patient Responses
Currently selected section: Measuring Multiple Symptoms
Global Rating of Change
Measuring Somatization
Measuring Other Domains
Conclusions


Chapter 16: Somatization and Symptoms Evaluation: Measuring Multiple Symptoms
        

This case illustrates a disorder where measuring more than one symptom is important. Many medical and psychological disorders are manifested by more than a single symptom.

  • Chronic lung disease is accompanied by dyspnea, fatigue, cough, and other symptoms.
  • Cancer, rheumatologic disorders, hypothyroidism and other endocrine diseases, multiple sclerosis and other neurologic conditions, depression, anxiety, and numerous other systemic diseases exhibit a variety of symptoms.
  • Functional syndromes such as irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and migraine headache consist of a constellation of symptoms.

Besides multiple symptoms, there are also multiple dimensions of a single symptom that can be measured (as previously mentioned) including severity, temporal factors (frequency and duration of episodes), and functional impairment.

An excellent example of a multi-symptom, multidimensional instrument is the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, included in Appendix 2 (Portenoy et al.,1994a).

Table 15.1 below provides a matrix of symptom measures in terms of number of symptoms evaluated, number of dimensions, and a third characteristic of the measure -- which symptoms are selected for evaluation.

Table15.1: Types of Measures for Evaluating Symptoms
Number of Symptoms Number of Dimensions Selection of Symptoms Example Measures
One
One
Fixed
Visual analogue or Likert-type pain or other symptom scale
One or Multiple
One
Patient
Same as above, but symptoms are selected by patient. MQOL-PS
One
Multiple
Fixed
Multidimensional scales for pain; fatigue; dyspnea; dizziness; irritable bowel syndrome.
Multiple
One
Fixed
PHQ-15; SCL-90
Multiple
Multiple
Fixed
Portenoy MSAS

Most measures are developed and validated with a fixed symptom or list of symptoms. However, there are measures in which the patient or subject decides which symptom or symptoms are most personally relevant.

One example of this patient-specific assessment that we have already provided is the measure used in Figure 3.2 and Figure 7.1 -- a generic measure which refers to the patient's "symptoms" (rather than a specific symptom), allowing the patient to rate whatever symptoms s/he is experiencing. If one is studying a population with a particular symptom, one could insert the particular symptom being studied (pain, dizziness, fatigue) for the word "symptoms".

Another measure in which the relevant symptoms are specific to the patient being evaluated is the McMaster's Quality of Life - Physical Symptom subscale (MQOL-PS) (Cohen et al.,1997; Tierney et al.,1998). As shown in Figure 15.1 below, the MQOL-PS allows patients to rate their 3 most bothersome symptoms.

Figure 15.1: McMaster's Quality of Life Physical Symptom Subscale
Example of MQOL-POS form, described in text.

The MQOL-PS was initially designed for use in palliative care where individuals may experience multiple symptoms, yet the symptoms most bothersome may vary from patient to patient.

A patient-centered scale like the MQOL-PS may be useful in patient follow-up to monitor the natural history (in an observational study) or therapeutic responsiveness (in a clinical trial) of the symptoms most relevant to a particular subject.

Alternatively, such a scale might be useful in rating adverse consequences of treatment (e.g. allowing the patient to choose and rate the side effects most relevant to them). For example, in an antidepressant trial, side effects such as sexual dysfunction or weight gain may be more relevant to one patient whereas sedation or gastrointestinal symptoms may be more important to another.

Scales with a fixed set of symptoms are useful in that they have typically been validated in a larger number of subjects and also allow comparison of the same set of symptoms or dimensions across patients with the same disorder as well as across different types of disorders which may share common symptoms. Examples of various types of symptom measures as well as the supporting references are provided in Table 15.1 shown earlier.

Page 20 of 26
Previous Section