| |
The previous
descriptive comparative designs with paired control subjects have
indicated that people with insomnia tend to have more stress,
emotional arousal, and physiological activation as indicated by
higher heart rates, metabolic rates, and SNS activity. This relationship
is seen most strikingly in subjects displaying psychophysiological-type
insomnia. The reciprocal issue is whether poor physical sleep
triggers or reinforces excess stress activation. Another approach
to probing the relationship of insomnia with sleep loss (i.e.
psychophysiological-type) to stress arousal and activation is
to mimic the sleep loss pattern in people without insomnia
or to worsen the sleep in people with insomnia and assess the
appropriate stress indicators.
In order to
design such a study you elect to use the same sample selection
process as suggested previously. Similarly, you will recruit and
select a group of people with insomnia using criteria and scores
from a 2-week sleep diary. You will match each person reporting
no sleep problems to a person who meets criteria for insomnia
on the basis of age, gender, and body mass index or select all
subjects with a BMI within a narrow range of 23-25 kg/m2.
After an adaptation night, a second night PSG record is used to
represent usual sleep. Subjects are qualified as having
insomnia if they show sleep onset latency > 30 min. or sleep efficiency
< 85% on both screening nights. Control subjects are retained
and matched if they meet PSG criteria of sleep onset latency <
30 min and sleep efficiency 90%.
For the next
7 nights, the control subjects will be exposed to a sleep pattern
that mimics the pattern of their designated insomnia pair subject
in terms of sleep onset, number of awakenings and sleep stage
amounts as documented using PSG. During these nights, mood, body
temperature and daytime sleepiness will be assessed. This design
is referred to as a yoked control design, as used by Bonnet and
Arand (Bonnet
and Arand, 1996). When your research team looks at the results,
you find that the sleep-disrupted group of previously good sleepers
has lower self-reported tension/confusion (POMS) scores and daytime
body temperatures, from pre- (baseline) to post-induced insomnia
time points. They score higher in daytime sleepiness [lower multiple
sleep latency test scores] as shown in the chart below (Bonnet
and Arand, 1996).
| Table
3.7.1: Yoked Control Study Results
|
|---|
|
| Baseline
Night
| Insomnia
Night 1
| Insomnia
Night 7
| p
value
|
|---|
Tension/anxiety
(POMS)
|
4.7
|
3.7
|
3.3
|
0.01
|
|---|
Oral
Body Temp. (daytime)
|
99.1
|
-
|
98.7
|
0.05
|
|---|
| MSLT
(min)
|
15.8
|
15.4
|
10.9
|
0.0001
|
|
Question
3.7.1
| These
outcomes (secondary to poor physical sleep imposed on good
sleepers) are different from those seen in people with chronic
insomnia. |
|
| True |
|
| False |
Question
3.7.2
| It
is logical to suppose that these secondary outcomes are related
to physical sleep loss, i.e. partial sleep deprivation. |
|
| True |
|
| False |
|